BNSF, CN propose $19 billion merger MONTREAL -- On December 20, 1999, Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Canadian
National confirmed rumors that had been circulating for several weeks and
announced they would merge into a $19 billion holding company to create
North America's largest railroad. The new company, to be called North American
Railways Inc., will be based in Montreal and will boast almost 50,000 miles
of track, stretching from Halifax on the Atlantic coast to Vancouver on
the Pacific and southward to New Orleans and Los Angeles. The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers vowed to protect the interests
of all railroad operating employees as it monitors the proposed merger. "Railroad companies always say there will be no job losses in mega-mergers
of this type, but history has taught us otherwise," said BLE International
President Edward Dubroski. "While we have yet to do so at this early
stage, we look forward to meeting with leaders of BNSF and CN to protect
the rights and jobs of our members." Under the terms of the deal, CN shareholders will receive 1.05 CN voting
shares for each CN common share and the choice of either 1.05 North American
Railways common stock or 1.05 CN shares exchangeable for the equivalent
of North American Railways. The CN voting share will trade together with
the exchangeable share as one security. To implement the transaction in
a tax-efficient manner, North American Railways, Inc. will be created as
the parent company for BNSF and as the companion company for CN. Burlington Northern shareholders will receive one North American Railways
common share and one CN voting share which will trade as one issue. The resulting 50,000-mile system, blanketing the U.S. West and stretching
from Vancouver to Halifax in Canada, will have 67,000 employees and annual
revenue of $12.5 billion. It was recently revealed that BNSF has agreed to pay CN $300 million
if the deal goes sour. Canadian National would have to pay BNSF $150 million
in those same circumstances. Through their trade associations, shippers questioned the wisdom of the
merger coming at this time. Linda Morgan, chairman of the STB, appeared to have been caught off guard
by the latest move to consolidate the railroad industry. "I am surprised by the timing of this proposal," she said.
"Railroads, together with their customers and employees, have not yet
fully adjusted to recent mergers, and this proposal may represent the beginning
of another round of major rail mergers. The Board will have to review carefully
all of the ramifications of any such application that may be filed,"
Morgan said. Jolene Molitoris, Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration,
said safety will be a key issue in approval of the merger. The other four major railroads not involved in the merger placed ads
in newspapers directed at rail-users voicing their opposition to the merger.
The campaign seeks to delay the deal rather than kill it outright, the Journal
of Commerce reported. Union Pacific, Canadian Pacific Railway, Norfolk Southern and CSX fired
the first salvo in the campaign with these ads. Sources said the idea for
the ads originated at Union Pacific. Analysts have said that U.S. regulatory approval by the Surface Transportation
Board and support from shippers and labor unions are the biggest hurdles
facing CN and BN in their merger. The merger must be approved by the STB
and stockholders of each corporation. © 2000
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
The combination of Montreal-based Canadian National, Canada's biggest
railway, and Fort Worth, Texas-based BN, the number two U.S. railroad, comes
just six months after CN closed its 1998 acquisition of Illinois Central
Corp. in a $3 billion transaction.
"The U.S. Department of Transportation is concerned with all aspects
of rail mergers, from the impact on competition to the effects on labor,
communities and the environment," Molitoris said. "We will be
an active participant in the proceeding before the Surface Transportation
Board, and will consult closely with all stakeholders as we develop our
position on this merger as we have in the past. First and foremost, however,
our primary responsibility is to ensure the safety of any newly-merged system."