1370 Ontario St. - Mezzanine, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
News and Issues
Departments
Secretary-
Treasurers
Information
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

Opinion: Remote control track record

(The following editorial appeared on the Fort Worth Star-Telegram website on March 26.)

FORT WORTH, Texas -- Ever since Texas and Pacific Railroad surveyors laid out the original Arlington, there's been an ongoing, 128-year train-and-town relationship. The association has been mostly harmonious, with a gripe about nighttime horns here, a grumble about rough road crossings there.

But excluding the 1885 derailment of T&P's Engine No. 642 at a flooded-out bridge at Village Creek, there were few safety concerns about the many trains traveling through the city daily.

For more than a century after the 1885 accident, the only other derailment involved a relatively minor problem off the main track in a switching area of the Great Southwest Industrial District.

But a series of three derailments in the city during the past five years poses reason for concern.

The first took place in late 1998 -- investigators citing the cause as inadequate maintenance. The second occurred in December 2002. Again the problem involved a short section of track in the same general area and, again, an apparent maintenance problem. That derailment left a rail car dangling over Texas 360 and closed down the freeway for several hours.

A third derailment took place in Arlington this month -- the problem this time being cited as a communication problem involving a remote-control system.

All of this could, of course, be coincidence. It could well be that the rail system will function flawlessly for the next century.

Or maybe not.

The idea of a 100-car train loaded with hazardous chemicals having an accident in the middle of a city -- itself with 375,000 residents -- in the midst of the Metroplex is at the very least an unsettling possibility.

At this juncture, the current track record, so to speak, isn't impressive.

It's time for Arlington leadership to insist that a higher level of public safety be assured

Friday, March 26, 2004

© 1997-2009 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Safety Task Force Hotline
800-306-5414

DAILY HEADLINES
November 20, 2009

AAR: U.S. rail freight volume down during Veterans Day holiday week
CN train crew now resting comfortably at home after hitting a rock/mud slide
TWU set to vote on SEPTA contract
Rail shippers, carriers see 2010 recovery
FRA study shows freight rail fuel efficiency up more than 20% since 1999
Buffett's Berkshire secures $8 billion loan for BNSF deal
Amtrak adding trains on Cascades route for Thanksgiving holiday
Montana sues BNSF over grain hauls
Opinion: New locomotives are green machines
Grand Central Terminal for Atlanta?
Report: 70 percent of Metra bridges need upgrades
Florida lawmakers confident about the passage of SunRail
CSX introduces ultra-low emission locomotives in Indiana
NS plan to run trains through park angers W.Va. officials
Amtrak extends fare promotion on Northeast Regional service
Rail grinding stirs some confusion
SEPTA moves ahead on extending R3 rail line
New York MTA sets final spending plan for 2010
UP derailment investigation continues in Ill.
Driver mistakes BNSF railroad tracks for road
Operation Lifesaver films distracted driving public service announcements
Midwest Association of Rail Shippers to host January meeting
Wisconsin land owner injured in ground collapse sues CSX
Union Pacific, San Antonio River Authority agree on new drift removal practices
CSX gives city $22,125 to plant trees along tracks
No Railroad Retirement benefit increase in 2010; Most retiree earnings limits remain at 2009 levels
Railroad Retirement annuities and pensions from work not covered by Social Security or Railroad Retirement
RRB: Medicare Part B Premiums for 2010
Final RRB Informational Conference of 2009 is Dec. 11

More Headlines


Enter your e-mail address to receive BLET news updates.

Subscribe  Unsubscribe