1370 Ontario St. - Mezzanine, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
News and Issues
Departments
Secretary-
Treasurers
Information
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

Cars derail in BNSF remote control accident

LINCOLN, Neb. -- Two train cars derailed Thursday when a remote-controlled locomotive stopped too late and hit an empty outbound cargo train leaving Burlington Northern Santa Fe's west Lincoln rail-switching yard, the Lincoln Journal Star reported.

BNSF spokesman Steve Forsberg said the minor crash was caused by operator error. A Lincoln spokesman for the engineers' union, which has raised safety concerns about remote-controlled locomotives, said the crash could have been prevented.

"In my opinion, had there been an experienced locomotive engineer operating the switch engine, in all likelihood, the incident would not have occurred," said Roy Helm of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers.

The low-speed collision occurred around 10:30 a.m., in a rail-switching yard west of downtown Lincoln, nestled south of West O Street between the U.S. 77 overpass and Southwest 40th Street, officials and Helm explained.

Access to the crash site was restricted. The wreck occurred on private property, and city rescue workers were not requested.

Forsberg said such collisions routinely happen with engineers in the cab. In this case, a remote operator chose to move the switch engine closer to a receiving track, thinking he could beat the local train or stop before it departed.

The crash did a few thousand dollars in damage to the switch locomotive and a few thousand dollars to the empty cargo cars, officials said.

Helm said BNSF was lucky the cars were empty. A similar wreck involving a hazardous materials car could've meant environmental damage that might have been avoided if the locomotive had been steered by an engineer.

Forsberg disagreed: "The technology did work. It was operator error."

The debate centers on industry use of remote-controlled locomotives in yard work and operation of them by train crew members instead of federally certified engineers, who train six months vs. 80 hours for remotes, Helm said.

Union officials have argued the growth in remote locomotive use could lead to job cuts. Railroad company officials have called the fears unfounded, arguing that the engineer layoffs haven't happened.

Said Helm: "The people operating are ... in my opinion not as qualified to be in control of these movements. Normally when we have movements approaching another train, we are more cautious."

A spokesman for the Federal Railroad Administration told the Journal Star earlier this month that there have been no incidents directly attributed to remote-controlled locomotives.

Friday, November 01, 2002

© 1997-2009 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Safety Task Force Hotline
800-306-5414

DAILY HEADLINES
November 20, 2009

AAR: U.S. rail freight volume down during Veterans Day holiday week
CN train crew now resting comfortably at home after hitting a rock/mud slide
TWU set to vote on SEPTA contract
Rail shippers, carriers see 2010 recovery
FRA study shows freight rail fuel efficiency up more than 20% since 1999
Buffett's Berkshire secures $8 billion loan for BNSF deal
Amtrak adding trains on Cascades route for Thanksgiving holiday
Montana sues BNSF over grain hauls
Opinion: New locomotives are green machines
Grand Central Terminal for Atlanta?
Report: 70 percent of Metra bridges need upgrades
Florida lawmakers confident about the passage of SunRail
CSX introduces ultra-low emission locomotives in Indiana
NS plan to run trains through park angers W.Va. officials
Amtrak extends fare promotion on Northeast Regional service
Rail grinding stirs some confusion
SEPTA moves ahead on extending R3 rail line
New York MTA sets final spending plan for 2010
UP derailment investigation continues in Ill.
Driver mistakes BNSF railroad tracks for road
Operation Lifesaver films distracted driving public service announcements
Midwest Association of Rail Shippers to host January meeting
Wisconsin land owner injured in ground collapse sues CSX
Union Pacific, San Antonio River Authority agree on new drift removal practices
CSX gives city $22,125 to plant trees along tracks
No Railroad Retirement benefit increase in 2010; Most retiree earnings limits remain at 2009 levels
Railroad Retirement annuities and pensions from work not covered by Social Security or Railroad Retirement
RRB: Medicare Part B Premiums for 2010
Final RRB Informational Conference of 2009 is Dec. 11

More Headlines


Enter your e-mail address to receive BLET news updates.

Subscribe  Unsubscribe