1370 Ontario St. - Mezzanine, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
News and Issues
Departments
Secretary-
Treasurers
Information
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

Opinion: Deep water port in Mexico again may impact Yuma

(The following column by Terry Ross appeared on the Yuma Sun website on October 31, 2009.)

YOMA, Ariz. — The announcement that plans for a new major deep water port in Mexico have been renewed is bound to stir controversy locally if the project actually materializes.

While the port is a long way from us, it is possible the Yuma area could be closely linked to it via a railroad that would carry cargo from the new deep water port into the United States after crossing at San Luis Rio Colorado, Son. — one of various rail routes that have been proposed.

The Mexico city's mayor, Manuel Baldenebro, said the route is one under consideration in bidding proposals recently put forward by the Mexico Ministry of Communications and Transportation. He said it would bring economic development to his city and to Yuma County.

Some local residents will undoubtedly remember a similar proposal that was put forward in 2007 when Union Pacific Railroad was looking at serving the new port in Punta Colonet, located on the west coast of Baja California south of Ensenada.

Local opposition marshalled quickly against putting the railroad through the Yuma area due to concerns about pollution, crime and deterioration of property values in neighboring areas. Although no route was ever actually selected, Union Pacific had inquired about possible acquisition of land south of Yuma.

In the end, Union Pacific decided to drop plans to serve the port due to various factors, including delays by Mexican officials in moving the project forward. This decision caused celebration among local opponents.

The megaport, reportedly the largest infrastructure project ever undertaken by Mexico and costing $4 billion or more, was put on the back burner by Mexico when the world economy tanked. Now with the announcement of bidding specifications for the port, it appears Mexico officials are ready to move forward again.

Mexico officials say four companies have expressed interest in bidding to build the port and operate it. Prospective bidders must indicate their interest by Nov. 3, according to the Ministry of Communications and Transportation.

By the time the port is finished in a few years, it would be ready to take advantage of a world economic recovery. It could eventually be one of the largest deep water ports on the Pacific Coast. Current ports are nearing maximum capacity, causing bottlenecks and delays in shipping of goods from Asia to the United States in normal economic times.

A necessary component in the concept is getting the goods from Punta Colonet to the United States by rail. There are limited places to connect with major U.S. rail lines, and one of those is through Yuma, meaning we will likely once again be on the short list.

If that happens, opposition would undoubtedly be renewed to the idea.

Part of the reason there was so much opposition to the previous plan here was an initial lack of openness about the proposal from railroad officials, who were trying to keep a low profile while looking for available land. But this allowed rumors to bloom and likely increased the suspicion of the opponents, who felt they were being deceived.

If indeed there are new plans for a rail line through the Yuma area, then those proposing it need to be very up-front about the plans. The community has to be part of the process if they are to go along with it. Concerns need to be heard and dealt with early in the process.

Monday, November 02, 2009

© 1997-2009 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Safety Task Force Hotline
800-306-5414

DAILY HEADLINES
November 20, 2009

AAR: U.S. rail freight volume down during Veterans Day holiday week
CN train crew now resting comfortably at home after hitting a rock/mud slide
TWU set to vote on SEPTA contract
Rail shippers, carriers see 2010 recovery
FRA study shows freight rail fuel efficiency up more than 20% since 1999
Buffett's Berkshire secures $8 billion loan for BNSF deal
Amtrak adding trains on Cascades route for Thanksgiving holiday
Montana sues BNSF over grain hauls
Opinion: New locomotives are green machines
Grand Central Terminal for Atlanta?
Report: 70 percent of Metra bridges need upgrades
Florida lawmakers confident about the passage of SunRail
CSX introduces ultra-low emission locomotives in Indiana
NS plan to run trains through park angers W.Va. officials
Amtrak extends fare promotion on Northeast Regional service
Rail grinding stirs some confusion
SEPTA moves ahead on extending R3 rail line
New York MTA sets final spending plan for 2010
UP derailment investigation continues in Ill.
Driver mistakes BNSF railroad tracks for road
Operation Lifesaver films distracted driving public service announcements
Midwest Association of Rail Shippers to host January meeting
Wisconsin land owner injured in ground collapse sues CSX
Union Pacific, San Antonio River Authority agree on new drift removal practices
CSX gives city $22,125 to plant trees along tracks
No Railroad Retirement benefit increase in 2010; Most retiree earnings limits remain at 2009 levels
Railroad Retirement annuities and pensions from work not covered by Social Security or Railroad Retirement
RRB: Medicare Part B Premiums for 2010
Final RRB Informational Conference of 2009 is Dec. 11

More Headlines


Enter your e-mail address to receive BLET news updates.

Subscribe  Unsubscribe